Developing variant-adapted COVID-19 vaccines to improve protection against Omicron and other recent variants: a plain language summary.

SummaryWhat are variant-adapted COVID-19 vaccines?The COVID-19 vaccine developed by BioNTech and Pfizer is known as BNT162b2 (Comirnaty). BNT162b2 contains messenger RNA, or mRNA, from SARS-CoV-2. SARS-CoV-2 is the virus responsible for COVID-19. mRNA is a type of genetic material that contains the instructions that tell cells in the body how to make a protein. The mRNA in BNT162b2 tells the body to make one of the proteins from SARS-CoV-2 known as the spike protein.This teaches the body's defense system, known as the immune system, to recognize and respond to a SARS-CoV-2 infection.The BNT162b2 vaccine contains mRNA from the first SARS-CoV-2 virus, which was detected in December 2019. Since this original vaccine was developed, the SARS-CoV-2 virus has evolved, resulting in the appearance of new versions of the virus, known as variants. Certain variants that might be more concerning for public health are labeled as either 'variants of concern' or 'variants of interest' by the World Health Organization (WHO). Variants have differences in their proteins compared with the original virus that can affect how well the original vaccine works against them. Therefore, BioNTech and Pfizer developed updated versions of the BNT162b2 vaccine that contain mRNA from certain variants. These new vaccines are called variant-adapted COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.Another company, Moderna, has also developed their own variant-adapted versions of their COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, mRNA-1273 (SpikeVax).Variant-adapted vaccines can contain parts of the variant mRNA either in addition to, or instead of, that from the original virus. Vaccines that contain mRNA from two different viruses are known as bivalent, whereas vaccines that contain mRNA from a single virus are called monovalent.

Effectiveness of the adapted bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccines against hospitalisation in individuals aged ≥ 60 years during the Omicron XBB lineage-predominant period: VEBIS SARI VE network, Europe, February to August, 2023.

We conducted a multicentre hospital-based test-negative case-control study to measure the effectiveness of adapted bivalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccines against PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection during the Omicron XBB lineage-predominant period in patients aged ≥ 60 years with severe acute respiratory infection from five countries in Europe. Bivalent vaccines provided short-term additional protection compared with those vaccinated > 6 months before the campaign: from 80% (95% CI: 50 to 94) for 14-89 days post-vaccination, 15% (95% CI: -12 to 35) at 90-179 days, and lower to no effect thereafter.

Efficacy of whole-cell-based monovalent and bivalent vaccines against Streptococcus iniae and Flavobacterium covae in fingerling Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer).

Streptococcosis and columnaris caused by Streptococcus spp. and Flavobacterium spp. have been recognized as critical problems in Asian seabass aquaculture development because they cause severe mortality. In this study, we identified various isolates of S. iniae and F. covae from diseased Asian seabass farmed in Thailand for use as candidates for vaccine development. The efficacy of the vaccines was evaluated by challenge tests and immune parameter analyses in fish that received whole-cell-based monovalent and bivalent vaccines containing S. iniae (Sin) and F. covae (Fco) delivered by top-dressed feed (TD) and intraperitoneal injection (IP). The results showed that all vaccinated groups exhibited increased antibody titers compared with control fish that peaked on day 28 after booster administration with high detection levels in the Sin-IP and Fco-IP groups. Moreover, the immune responses to the injected monovalent vaccines (Sin-IP and Fco-IP) were better than the responses in the other vaccinated groups. The hematological and innate immunological parameters were significantly increased by Sin-IP and Fco-IP, particularly lysozyme activity, nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) activity, bactericidal activity, and white blood cell numbers, and immune-related genes, including IgM, MHC-IIα, TCRß and CD4, were significantly upregulated in the head kidney, whole blood and spleen (P < 0.05). After experimental challenge, survival in the Sin-IP and Fco-IP groups was significantly higher than that in the Sin-TD, Fco-TD, Sin + Fco-TD, and Sin + Fco-IP groups, with 80.0 % and 60.0 % survival after S. iniae and F. covae infection, respectively. In contrast, survival after bacterial challenge in the control groups was 10 % in each group. Histopathological analysis revealed that Sin-IP- and Fco-IP-vaccinated fish exhibited significantly more goblet cells in the intestines and melanomacrophage centers (MMCs) in the head kidney and spleen than those in the other groups (P < 0.05). Overall, the results of our study indicated that the monovalent vaccines Sin-IP and Fco-IP provoked better vaccine efficacy and immune responses than their orally administered counterparts, and these results are consistent with those from the immunological assays that showed significantly increased responses after immunization.

Humoral antibody response following mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in solid organ transplant recipients; a status after a fifth and bivalent vaccine dose.

Background: In solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, the humoral response following COVID-19 vaccination is reduced, as a result of their immunosuppressed treatment. In this study, we investigated antibody concentrations after booster vaccinations until the fifth dose, the latter by monovalent or bivalent BA1 or BA4/5 vaccines. In addition, we evaluated the efficacy of vaccination by recording breakthrough infections, hospitalizations, and deaths. Method: This prospective cohort study included 438 SOT recipients (>18 years) vaccinated with mRNA vaccines against COVID-19 from January 2021 until March 2023. Blood samples were drawn before and after each vaccination and tested for SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD IgG antibodies with the lowest and highest cut-off at 7.1 and 5,680 BAU/mL, respectively. Vaccine information, breakthrough infections, and hospitalizations were collected from the medical records. Results: Most participants received BNT162b2 and 61.4% received five vaccine doses. The response proportion in SOT recipients increased from 86.7% after the fourth dose to 93.0% following the fifth dose. Antibody concentration decreased with 142.7 BAU/mL between the third and fourth dose (median 132 days, Quartile 1: 123, Quartile 3: 148) and 234.3 BAU/mL between the fourth and fifth (median 250 days, Quartile 1: 241, Quartile 3: 262) dose among those without breakthrough infection (p=0.34). When comparing the Omicron BA.1 or Omicron BA.4/BA.5 adapted vaccines, no significant differences in antibody concentration were found, but 20.0% of SOT recipients receiving a monovalent fifth vaccine dose had a breakthrough infection compared to 4.0% and 7.9% among those who received BA.1 and BA.4/BA.5 adapted vaccines, respectively (p=0.04). Since January 2021, 240 (54.8%) participants had a breakthrough infection, and 22 were hospitalized, but no deaths were observed. Conclusions: The fifth COVID-19 vaccine dose raised antibody response to 93.0% of the study population. Additional booster doses, as well as bivalent vaccines, led to higher levels of antibody concentration in SOT recipients. We found a lower incidence of breakthrough infections among SOT recipients after receiving a bivalent vaccine as a fifth dose compared to those receiving a monovalent dose. Antibody concentrations did not wane when the time between doses was prolonged from four to eight months.

Evaluation of inactivated avian influenza virus and Newcastle disease virus bivalent vaccination program against newly circulated H5N8 and NDV strains.

Avian influenza virus (AIV) and Newcastle disease virus (NDV) are respiratory illness syndromes that have recently been detected in vaccinated flocks and are causing major financial losses in the chicken farming industry. The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of Valley Vac H5Plus NDVg7 vaccine in protecting chickens against the H5N8 and NDV strains that have recently been circulating in comparison with the efficacy of the commercially available bivalent H5+ND7 vaccine. In contrast to the H5+ND7 vaccine, which was made of genetically distinct H5N8/2018 clade 2.3.4.4b genotype group (G5), H9N2/2016, H5N1/2017, and genetically comparable NDV genotype VII 1.1/2019 of the recently circulating challenge viruses, the Valley Vac H5Plus NDVg7 vaccine consisted of the recently isolated (RG HPAI H5N1 AIV/2015 Clade 2.2.1.2, RG HPAIV H5N8/2020 Clade 2.3.4.4b genotype group 6 (G6), and NDV genotype VII 1.1/2012) which were genetically similar to challenged strains. To determine the effectiveness of the Valley Vac H5Plus NDVg7 vaccine, a total of 70-day-old commercial chicks were divided into 7 groups of 10 birds each. Groups (G1 and G4) received Valley Vac H5Plus NDVg7 vaccine. Groups (G2 and G5) groups received commercial H5+ND7 vaccine. While groups (G3 and G6) were kept nonvaccinated, and group (G7) was kept as a nonchallenged and nonvaccinated. After 3-wk post vaccination (WPV), groups G1, G2, and G3 were challenged with A/Duck/ Egypt/SMG4/2019(H5N8) genotype G6. On the other hand, groups G4, G5, G6 were challenged with NDV/EGYPT/18629F/2018 genotype VII 1.1 with an intranasal injection of 0.1 mL. Antibody titer was calculated at the first 3 wk after vaccination, and the viral shedding titer was calculated at 3-, 5-, and 7-days post challenge. Mortality and morbidity rates were monitored daily during the experiment, and for the first 10 d after the challenge, to provide an estimate of the protection rate. The results showed that a single dosage of 0.5 mL per bird of Valley Vac H5Plus NDVg7 vaccine provides 80% protection against both H5N8 and NDV, compared to the bivalent H5+ND7 vaccine, which provided 20 and 80% protection against H5N8 and NDV, respectively. In addition, 0.5 mL per bird of Valley Vac H5Plus NDVg7 vaccine produced a greater immune response against both viruses than commercial vaccination at 1 to 3 WPV with a significant difference at 1 WPV for H5N8 and a comparatively higher immune response for NDV. Furthermore, it reduced virus shedding of H5N8 on the third, fifth, seventh, and tenth days lower than H5+ND7 vaccine with a significant difference on the third day for H5N8 and relatively lower than bivalent H5+ND7 vaccine for NDV with a significant difference on the fifth day. The Valley vaccinated group demonstrated more tissue intactness compared to the commercially vaccinated group against the H5N8 challenge, however the bivalent commercially vaccinated group showed the similar level of tissue integrity against NDV. In conclusion, Valley Vac H5Plus NDVg7  that contains the  genetically similar strain to recently circulating challenged virus (H5N8 genotype G6) provided better protection with greater immune response and decreased the amount of virus shed against H5N8 genotype G6 and showed less histopathological alteration than the commercial bivalent H5+ND7 vaccine that contain genetically distinct (H5N8 genotype G5). However the Valley Vac H5Plus NDVg7 provided the same protection with relatively high immune response and  relatively decreased the amount of virus shed and showed equal tissue integrity than the commercial bivalent H5+ND7 vaccine against NDV genotype VII 1.1 that contain the same genotype of NDV genotype VII 1.1.

Omicron Variant-Specific Serological Imprinting Following BA.1 or BA.4/5 Bivalent Vaccination and Previous SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Continuous evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outpaces monovalent vaccine cross-protection to new viral variants. Consequently, bivalent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines including Omicron antigens were developed. The contrasting immunogenicity of the bivalent vaccines and the impact of prior antigenic exposure on new immune imprinting remains to be clarified. METHODS: In the large prospective ENFORCE cohort, we quantified spike-specific antibodies to 5 Omicron variants (BA.1 to BA.5) before and after BA.1 or BA.4/5 bivalent booster vaccination to compare Omicron variant-specific antibody inductions. We evaluated the impact of previous infection and characterized the dominant antibody responses. RESULTS: Prior to the bivalent fourth vaccine, all participants (N = 1697) had high levels of Omicron-specific antibodies. Antibody levels were significantly higher in individuals with a previous polymerase chain reaction positive (PCR+) infection, particularly for BA.2-specific antibodies (geometric mean ratio [GMR] 6.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.05-7.62). Antibody levels were further significantly boosted in all individuals by receiving either of the bivalent vaccines, but greater fold inductions to all Omicron variants were observed in individuals with no prior infection. The BA.1 bivalent vaccine generated a dominant response toward BA.1 (adjusted GMR 1.31, 95% CI 1.09-1.57) and BA.3 (1.32, 1.09-1.59) antigens in individuals with no prior infection, whereas the BA.4/5 bivalent vaccine generated a dominant response toward BA.2 (0.87, 0.76-0.98), BA.4 (0.85, 0.75-0.97), and BA.5 (0.87, 0.76-0.99) antigens in individuals with a prior infection. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination and previous infection leave a clear serological imprint that is focused on the variant-specific antigen. Importantly, both bivalent vaccines induce high levels of Omicron variant-specific antibodies, suggesting broad cross-protection of Omicron variants.

Clinical development of variant-adapted BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccines: the early Omicron era.

INTRODUCTION: The Omicron BA.1 variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and subsequent sub-lineages exhibit partial escape from neutralizing antibodies elicited by vaccines containing or encoding wild-type spike protein. In response to the emergence of Omicron sub-lineages, variant-adapted vaccines that contain or encode for Omicron spike protein components have been developed. AREAS COVERED: This review presents currently available clinical immunogenicity and safety data on Omicron variant-adapted versions of the BNT162b2 messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine and summarizes the expected mechanism of action, and rationale for development, of these vaccines. In addition, challenges encountered during development and regulatory approval are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Omicron-adapted BNT162b2 vaccines provide a wider breadth and potentially more durable protection against Omicron sub-lineages and antigenically aligned variants when compared with the original vaccine. As SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve, further vaccine updates may be required. To facilitate this, a globally harmonized regulatory process for the transition to updated vaccines is needed. Next-generation vaccine approaches may provide broader protection against future variants.

Insights for COVID-19 in 2023 / Perspectivas de COVID-19 para 2023

Predictions for a near end of the pandemic by the World Health Organization should be interpreted with caution. Current evidence indicates that the efficacy of a fourth dose of classical mRNA vaccines (BT162b2 or mRNA-1273) is low and short-lived in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection in its predominant variant (Omicron). However, its efficacy is high against severe symptomatic infection, hospitalization and death. The new vaccines being introduced are bivalent and active against the Omicron variants. Potential new vaccines to be introduced in the coming year include a vaccine based on a recombinant protein that emulates the receptor binding domain of the Spike protein under development by the Spanish company Hipra, as well as vaccines for nasal or oral administration. Available information suggests that vaccines against COVID-19 can be administered in association with influenza vaccination without particular complications. New drugs against COVID-19, both antiviral and anti-inflammatory, are under investigation, but this does not seem to be the case with monoclonal antibodies. The indication to use masks in some circumstances will be maintained next year in view of the accumulation of scientific data on their efficacy. Finally, the long COVID or Post-COVID syndrome may continue to affect a very high proportion of patients who have had the disease, requiring combined diagnostic and therapeutic resources. (AU)

Las predicciones para un próximo fin de la pandemia de la Organización Mundial de la Salud deben interpretarse con precaución. La evidencia actual indica que la eficacia de una cuarta dosis de las vacunas clásicas ARNm (BNT162b2 o mRNA-1273) es baja y de corta duración para prevenir la infección de SARS-CoV-2 en su variante predominante (Omicron). No obstante, su eficacia es alta frente a la infección sintomática grave, hospitalización y muerte. Las nuevas vacunas que están siendo introducidas son bivalentes y activas frente a las variantes Omicron. Entre las potenciales nuevas vacunas que se introducirán en el próximo año, se encuentra una vacuna basada en una proteína recombinante que emula el dominio de unión al receptor de la proteína Spike en desarrollo por la compañía española Hipra, así como vacunas de administración nasal u oral. La información disponible apunta a que las vacunas frente al COVID-19 podrán administrarse asociadas a la vacunación antigripal sin particulares complicaciones. Se encuentran en investigación nuevos fármacos frente a COVID-19 tanto antivirales como anti-inflamatorios pero no parece ocurrir lo mismo con los anticuerpos monoclonales. La indicación de utilizar mascarillas en algunas circunstancias se mantendrá el próximo año en vista a la acumulación de datos científicos sobre su eficacia. Finalmente, el síndrome del COVID largo o Post-COVID puede que siga afectando a una proporción muy elevada de los pacientes que sufrieron la enfermedad, requiriendo recursos diagnósticos y terapéuticos combinados. (AU)

Insights for COVID-19 in 2023.

Predictions for a near end of the pandemic by the World Health Organization should be interpreted with caution. Current evidence indicates that the efficacy of a fourth dose of classical mRNA vaccines (BT162b2 or mRNA-1273) is low and short-lived in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection in its predominant variant (Omicron). However, its efficacy is high against severe symptomatic infection, hospitalization and death. The new vaccines being introduced are bivalent and active against the Omicron variants. Potential new vaccines to be introduced in the coming year include a vaccine based on a recombinant protein that emulates the receptor binding domain of the Spike protein under development by the Spanish company Hipra, as well as vaccines for nasal or oral administration. Available information suggests that vaccines against COVID-19 can be administered in association with influenza vaccination without particular complications. New drugs against COVID-19, both antiviral and anti-inflammatory, are under investigation, but this does not seem to be the case with monoclonal antibodies. The indication to use masks in some circumstances will be maintained next year in view of the accumulation of scientific data on their efficacy. Finally, the long COVID or Post-COVID syndrome may continue to affect a very high proportion of patients who have had the disease, requiring combined diagnostic and therapeutic resources.

Real-world evidence on the efficacy of bivalent booster doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in respect of monovalent boosters or primary cycle of vaccination: a narrative review.

OBJECTIVES: the objective of this review is to give an overall view of the knowledge on COVID-19 bivalent vaccines and to explore the available real-world evidence on their effectiveness in the Omicron era. Currently, bivalent vaccines are generally offered to all groups eligible for their next booster, as defined by the national vaccination campaigns, with varying policies between countries.The use of bivalent vaccines is supported by immunogenity studies, but these have produced contradictory conclusions and are not generally designed to measure clinical impact. DESIGN: in order to critically evaluate the available research on real-world efficacy, a systematic literature search was performed; three different web engines were used, including early-stage search platforms: PubMed, medRxiv and the Global research on coronavirus disease (COVID-19) database. SETTING: no restrictions were imposed on language, setting or publication date. The research was last updated on 20 March 2023. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: the following outcomes were considered: infection, hospitalisation due to COVID-19 disease, admission to the emergency/urgency department, death. The following were considered as additional outcomes: variant-specific vaccine effectiveness; vaccine effectiveness waning over time. RESULTS: out of 876 references reviewed, 14 studies were finally included and extracted. The results of this review show modest to moderate additional protection from vaccination with bivalent BA.4-5 or BA.1 vaccines mRNA-booster against COVID-19-associated disease - Relative VE% ranging from 8 (95% CI 0-16) to 58.7 (95% 54.6-62.5)- and hospitalisation - Relative VE% ranging from 32.2 (2.5-60.1) to 80.5 (95% CI 69.5-91.5)-, when compared with a booster with a monovalent vaccine or with having completed only the primary course, during a period when BA.5 and other Omicron sublineage viruses predominated globally. CONCLUSIONS: the additional benefit of bivalent booster vaccines - compared to one or two monovalent booster vaccinations or compared to the primary course alone - in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection appears to be small, especially in persons with previous Omicron infection, whereas modest to moderate protection from vaccination with bivalent BA.4-5 or BA.1 mRNA-booster vaccines as a fourth dose against COVID-19-associated illness and hospitalisation has been reported.

Engineering of Live Chimeric Vaccines against Human Metapneumovirus.

Human metapneumovirus (HMPV) is an important human pathogen that, along with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), is a major cause of respiratory tract infections in young infants. Development of an effective vaccine against Pneumoviruses has proven to be particularly difficult; despite over 50 years of research in this field, no vaccine against HMPV or RSV is currently available. Recombinant chimeric viruses expressing antigens of other viruses can be generated by reverse genetics and used for simultaneous immunization against more than one pathogen. This approach can result in the development of promising vaccine candidates against HMPV, and several studies have indeed validated viral vectors expressing HMPV antigens. In this review, we summarize current efforts in generating recombinant chimeric vaccines against HMPV, and we discuss their potential optimization based on the correspondence with RSV studies.

Two Novel Salmonella Bivalent Vaccines Confer Dual Protection against Two Salmonella Serovars in Mice.

Non-typhoidal Salmonella includes thousands of serovars that are leading causes of foodborne diarrheal illness worldwide. In this study, we constructed three bivalent vaccines for preventing both Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Newport infections by using the aspartate semialdehyde dehydrogenase (Asd)-based balanced-lethal vector-host system. The constructed Asd+ plasmid pCZ11 carrying a subset of the Salmonella Newport O-antigen gene cluster including the wzx-wbaR-wbaL-wbaQ-wzy-wbaW-wbaZ genes was introduced into three Salmonella Typhimurium mutants: SLT19 (Δasd) with a smooth LPS phenotype, SLT20 (Δasd ΔrfbN) with a rough LPS phenotype, and SLT22 (Δasd ΔrfbN ΔpagL::T araC PBADrfbN) with a smooth LPS phenotype when grown with arabinose. Immunoblotting demonstrated that SLT19 harboring pCZ11 [termed SLT19 (pCZ11)] co-expressed the homologous and heterologous O-antigens; SLT20 (pCZ11) exclusively expressed the heterologous O-antigen; and when arabinose was available, SLT22 (pCZ11) expressed both types of O-antigens, while in the absence of arabinose, SLT22 (pCZ11) expressed only the heterologous O-antigen. Exclusive expression of the heterologous O-antigen in Salmonella Typhimurium decreased the swimming ability of the bacterium and its susceptibility to polymyxin B. Next, the crp gene was deleted from the three recombinant strains for attenuation purposes, generating the three bivalent vaccine strains SLT25 (pCZ11), SLT26 (pCZ11), and SLT27 (pCZ11), respectively. Groups of BALB/c mice (12 mice/group) were orally immunized with 109 CFU of each vaccine strain twice at an interval of 4 weeks. Compared with a mock immunization, immunization with all three vaccine strains induced significant serum IgG responses against both Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Newport LPS. The bacterial loads in the mouse tissues were significantly lower in the three vaccine-strain-immunized groups than in the mock group after either Salmonella Typhimurium or Salmonella Newport lethal challenge. All of the mice in the three vaccine-immunized groups survived the lethal Salmonella Typhimurium challenge. In contrast, SLT26 (pCZ11) and SLT27 (pCZ11) conferred full protection against lethal Salmonella Newport challenge, but SLT25 (pCZ11) provided only 50% heterologous protection. Thus, we developed two novel Salmonella bivalent vaccines, SLT26 (pCZ11) and SLT27 (pCZ11), suggesting that the delivery of a heterologous O-antigen in attenuated Salmonella strains is a prospective approach for developing Salmonella vaccines with broad serovar coverage.

A Bivalent Anthrax-Plague Vaccine That Can Protect against Two Tier-1 Bioterror Pathogens, Bacillus anthracis and Yersinia pestis.

Bioterrorism remains as one of the biggest challenges to global security and public health. Since the deadly anthrax attacks of 2001 in the United States, Bacillus anthracis and Yersinia pestis, the causative agents of anthrax and plague, respectively, gained notoriety and were listed by the CDC as Tier-1 biothreat agents. Currently, there is no Food and Drug Administration-approved vaccine against either of these threats for mass vaccination to protect general public, let alone a bivalent vaccine. Here, we report the development of a single recombinant vaccine, a triple antigen consisting of all three target antigens, F1 and V from Y. pestis and PA from B. anthracis, in a structurally stable context. Properly folded and soluble, the triple antigen retained the functional and immunogenicity properties of all three antigens. Remarkably, two doses of this immunogen adjuvanted with Alhydrogel® elicited robust antibody responses in mice, rats, and rabbits and conferred complete protection against inhalational anthrax and pneumonic plague. No significant antigenic interference was observed. Furthermore, we report, for the first time, complete protection of animals against simultaneous challenge with Y. pestis and the lethal toxin of B. anthracis, demonstrating that a single biodefense vaccine can protect against a bioterror attack with weaponized B. anthracis and/or Y. pestis. This bivalent anthrax-plague vaccine is, therefore, a strong candidate for stockpiling, after demonstration of its safety and immunogenicity in human clinical trials, as part of national preparedness against two of the deadliest bioterror threats.

Evaluation of monovalent and bivalent vaccines against lethal Enterovirus 71 and Coxsackievirus A16 infection in newborn mice.

Enterovirus 71 (EV71) and Coxsackievirus A16 (CVA16) have caused severe epidemics of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) in the Asia Pacific in recent years, particularly in infants and young children. This disease has become a serious public health problem, as no vaccines or antiviral drugs have been approved for EV71 and CA16 infections. In this study, we compared four monovalent vaccines, including formalin-inactivated EV71 virus (iEV71), EV71 virus-like particles (VLPs) (vEV71), formalin-inactivated CVA16 virus (iCVA16) and CVA16 VLPs (vCVA16), along with two bivalent vaccines, including equivalent doses of formalin-inactivated EV71+CVA16 virus (iEV71+iCVA16) and EV71+CVA16 VLPs (vEV71+vCVA16). The IgG titers and neutralization antibodies titers demonstrated that there are no immune interference exists between the two immunogens of EV71 and CVA16. IgG subclass isotyping revealed that IgG1 and IgG2b were induced primarily in all vaccine groups. Furthermore, cross-neutralization antibodies were elicited in mouse sera against other sub-genotypes of EV71 and CVA16. In vivo challenge experiments showed that the immune sera from vaccinated animals could confer passive protection to newborn mice against lethal challenge with 14 LD50 of EV71 and 50 LD50 of CVA16. Our results indicated that bivalent vaccination is promising for HFMD vaccine development. With the advantage of having a better safety profile than inactivated virus vaccines, VLPs should be used to combine both EV71 and CVA16 antigens as a candidate vaccine for prevention of HFMD virus transmission.